Mark Ryan wrote:
One question that I haven't seen answered relating
to the jury process
(and I might have missed it) is why was there such a long delay
between the scheduled time for announcement of the winner, and the
actual announcement?
Coming as we do from a culture based on discussion leading to consensus,
it's a bit of a challenge to wrench the process to a conclusion ahead of
the time that would be required if the discussion was left to run its
course. Despite efforts to accelerate things to meet deadlines, it felt
a bit like pulling teeth. Personally I offer my apologies to all of the
bid teams on this point.
--Michael Snow