On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Brad Patrick <bradp.wmf(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Andrew Gray
<shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
More to the point, it'd be overkill to do it any other way
We create new projects very rarely - let's look at the past list.
2001 - Wikipedia
2002 - Wiktionary
2003 - Wikibooks, Wikiquote, Wikisource
2004 - *Commons, Wikispecies, Wikinews
2005 - [nothing]
2006 - Wikiversity
2007 - [nothing]
2008 - [nothing so far]
You might add 2005 - Wikimania as a meatspace project. That seems to have
worked out well.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
I would lump Wikimania in with Meta, the Foundation wiki, and any other
of the "organizational" wikis we have. They're not projects for producing
content, as with the 'pedias, 'sources, etc; but are there in a supportive
role.
-Chad