Am 31.07.2013 15:07 schrieb "Risker" <risker.wp(a)gmail.com>om>:
On 31 July 2013 08:36, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 31 July 2013 10:59, rupert THURNER <rupert.thurner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> de:wp convinced you. What would it take to convince you on en:wp?
(I'm
> >> asking for a clear objective criterion
here. If you can only offer a
> >> subjective one, please explain how de:wp convinced you when en:wp
> >> hasn't.)
>
> > Hi David, i am editing on dewp and enwp. I consider myself an
experienced
> > editor, but not an expert. I did not
participate voting in dewp, but i
> like
> > to try ve from time to time. Beeing a software developper I fully
support
eriks arguments before. Imo pragmatic and flexible
decisions help such
development a lot, just like Erik explained.
Certainly. However, it's the obvious question to ask, and a curious
question to spend several paragraphs not answering.
Erik, James - how did de:wp convinced you when en:wp hasn't?
I would also like to see a direct answer to David's very specific
question.
From a software developers standpoint its nice to have the 2 biggest wikis
following
a different strategy. Enwp is enough to get a lot of testers. But
some accommodation of the users comes with it. Switching over wpde later
gets again not accommodated and more critical feedback.