--- Andre Engels <engelsAG(a)t-online.de> wrote:
It's NOT free, you say? So, I may not use it
freely? You DO have a strange
definition of 'free'.
Not libre, which in this context means it is only half free. Yes, you can *use*
it freely, but the content itself is not free.
Decrease that
freedom? How when anything from a derivative work can be
reincorporated back into the original? In what way does that decrease the
freedom of the original document?
By restricting how it may be used. What other way could there be to decrease
freedom?
Those restrictions are designed to ensure the freedom of the content, meaning
it can not be controled.
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/