On 12 September 2011 23:17, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sep 12, 2011 11:10 PM, "Thomas Morton"
<morton.thomas(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
> It's a tiny bit disappointing that the tone
here is "oh well, we tried and
> failed".
> When really it should be "cool - now we have a competitor, what do we need
> to give WN to help them stay in the market"
In what way are we competing? Our vision is a world
where people have free
access to all knowledge. It doesn't say we need to be the ones to provide
that knowledge.
We've failed. Maybe someone else will do better. If they do, our goal will
still be achieved.
Wikinews is still recoverable. But what it's been doing so far clearly
failed. What can they do that would work? Open it up further?
- d.