I should add that if folk are interested in the english wikipedia, and have
any ideas / comments etc. in this area, I kicked this off here;
cheers,
Peter,
PM.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Brian J Mingus
<Brian.Mingus(a)colorado.edu>wrote;wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:04 PM, private musings
<thepmaccount(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
On Wikipedia Review, 'tarantino' pointed out that on WMF projects,
self-identified minors (in this case User:Juliancolton) are involved in
routine maintenance stuff around sexually explicit images reasonably
describable as porn (one example is 'Masturbating Amy.jpg').
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=27358&st=0&p=204846&…
I think this is wrong on a number of levels - and I'd like to see better
governance from the foundation in this area - I really feel that we need
to
talk about some child protection measures in some
way - they're overdue.
I'd really like to see the advisory board take a look at this issue - is
there a formal way of suggesting or requesting their thoughts, or could I
just ask here for a board member or community member with the advisory
board's ear to raise this with them.
best,
Peter,
PM.
Wikipedia is not porn.
29 posts left.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l