I should add that if folk are interested in the english wikipedia, and have any ideas / comments etc. in this area, I kicked this off here;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Child_Protection
cheers,
Peter, PM.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Brian J Mingus Brian.Mingus@colorado.eduwrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:04 PM, private musings <thepmaccount@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
On Wikipedia Review, 'tarantino' pointed out that on WMF projects, self-identified minors (in this case User:Juliancolton) are involved in routine maintenance stuff around sexually explicit images reasonably describable as porn (one example is 'Masturbating Amy.jpg').
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=27358&st=0&p=204846&a...
I think this is wrong on a number of levels - and I'd like to see better governance from the foundation in this area - I really feel that we need
to
talk about some child protection measures in some way - they're overdue.
I'd really like to see the advisory board take a look at this issue - is there a formal way of suggesting or requesting their thoughts, or could I just ask here for a board member or community member with the advisory board's ear to raise this with them.
best,
Peter, PM.
Wikipedia is not porn.
29 posts left. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l