Daniel Mayer wrote:
--- Elisabeth Bauer <elian(a)djini.de> wrote:
Working tools:
* an internal press wiki (enotif enabled) and a mailing list will be
used to coordinate the work of the communications committee. The mailing
list and the wiki will be open to all people doing PR on an
international or project level.
* the press queues in otrs
* the press release distribution and archive software on wikimedia.de
A separate list I can understand (I plan to have one for finance). But why is there a
need for a
separate Wiki? We already have InternalWiki whose editors must be approved of by the
board not
only to edit but to even view pages. Do we now not trust all board members, officers and
the board
members of chapters? If so, then we are in serious trouble.
Problem is Mav... Some members of the committees are neither board
members, nor officers, no members of chapters. They are just simply
themselves, good people we like and trust....
Only problem, there is some confidential stuff on the internal wiki, and
some people might be unhappy that all committees members are given
access to it.
For myself, I would be glad to work mostly on meta or on a more discreet
place (with for example, login mandatory and rather open membership), an
archive-open mailing list, and hack the confidential stuff by private
email and if necessary put the confidential stuff on internal.
ant
A separate wiki for press and PR is a very bad idea
since other parts of the organization will
also need to periodically be involved in press/PR issues. At the very least they need to
be
informed of what is going on so they don't get blindsided. Other times their input
will be needed.
All that can and should be done in one centralized place, InternalWiki.
Anything uber secret should only be handled by the board and they already have their own
wiki.
-- mav
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com