Hi all,
I know this might be a bit off topic but I'll risk it anyways.
One told me a couple weeks ago that CAPTCHA (at least one CAPTCHA) was
created or used to transcribe documents bit by bit, each word you enter
corresponds to a two word link, that when it reaches so many equal
responses is marked as resolved and moved to the next word on a document.
Wouldn't be wonderful if we could use this idea to transcribe documents in
Wikisource, create our own CAPTCHA for the benefit of our own projects.
Also, filling up a CAPTCHA this way, would make it count as one more edit.
Thus we will be more synergetic towards our own efforts, and have a CAPTCHA
might make sense overall if needed.
Please fill free to separate the thread or correct me, since I only used my
friends story as a source.
Best!
El jun. 19, 2015 10:59 AM, "Andy Mabbett" <andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk>
escribió:
On 19 June 2015 at 13:54, WereSpielChequers
<werespielchequers(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Earlier this year as a result of the glam
organisers event in Paris I
made a proposal at bugzilla for an event organisers
useright. This would
have allowed us to circumvent this problem at those editathons that are
targeted at newbies, and it got widely endorsed by GLAM editors from
several languages. Sadly it got marked as resolved because there was
something that looked similar to developers, though not of course to
potential users. If anyone here knows how to bypass phabricator or how to
mark a phabricator request as unresolved and still much wanted, then the
link is
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T91928
I've reopened it - please comment there.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>