As you surely know, the work of all staff, including 'how they spend
money' is continuously assessed by the ED who in turn is evaluated by
the board. There is also 3rd party financial audit. What are you
hinting at?
Erik/Naoko: does the Stanton grant include a condition for (external)
specific program evaluation?
On 1/10/09, Brian <Brian.Mingus(a)colorado.edu> wrote:
Thank you Naoko.
How can we be sure the money will be spent wisely?
Obama recently appointed a Chief Performance Officer. Do you have someone
providing similar oversight?
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Naoko Komura <nkomura(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, Brian.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Brian <Brian.Mingus(a)colorado.edu> wrote:
Why are so few community-developed mediawiki
extensions used by the
Foundation?
The plan for Usability Initiative includes intensive reviews of MediaWiki
extensions which are already available. Then we will enable candidate
extensions with some set of test data in the test and lab environment.
Community involvement is essential in validating which extensions to
adopt.
Usability test is targeted for users with no or little experience in
editing
Wikipedia and the goal is to identify interactive obstacles. The proposed
solution will be tested for feedback similar way as testing existing
extensions.
I also believe it is important to iterate the process above so that we can
reach out to as many as possible.
The project page is in the plan and once it is up, I hope to exchange and
share ideas with the community.
Best,
- Naoko
--
Support Free Knowledge:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
You have successfully failed!
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l