Alex wrote:
Except unless we consider the initial edit to be the
first check, its
not correct. Only one person independent from the editor is reviewing
each edit.
This is one of my main objections to the term.
The write-in candidate "Revision Review" appears to combine the best
elements of "Pending Revisions" and "Double Check." Tango and I (who
strongly prefer opposing candidates) agree that it's a good option.
It seems like an excellent solution, and I hope that it can garner
sufficient support.
Irrespective of his/her opinion, everyone should weigh in at the
designated discussion page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Flagged_protection_and_patrolled_rev…
David Levy