Alex wrote:
Except unless we consider the initial edit to be the first check, its not correct. Only one person independent from the editor is reviewing each edit.
This is one of my main objections to the term.
The write-in candidate "Revision Review" appears to combine the best elements of "Pending Revisions" and "Double Check." Tango and I (who strongly prefer opposing candidates) agree that it's a good option. It seems like an excellent solution, and I hope that it can garner sufficient support.
Irrespective of his/her opinion, everyone should weigh in at the designated discussion page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Flagged_protection_and_patrolled_revi...
David Levy