On 1/2/07, Anthere <Anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Teun Spaans wrote:
A number of people answered this call. A summary
of ideas from the dutch pub:
* save money on bandwith by symplfying html. - however, I checked and
html seems already pretty lean.
* Save discspace by deleting older versions of articles - probably
contradicts GFDL.
* Make lists of charities. Foundation board is probably already doing this.
** I remember seeing such a list from Danny. But yes, that's something
we should work on.
* There were a number of people who suggested
running selected commercial ads.
* Distributed storage - technically probably not yet feasible
* Grid computing
* Publish thematical information as commercial books
** legal risk associated with publishing (same for dvd below), but we
can have others publish or sell them, and get royalties. Hopefully, a
deal will soon be signed up on this matter, which I hope we can generalized.
* Sell dvds, either whole encyclopedia or
thematical
* Make deals with clones or block them
There are a handful of such deals. Just a handful.
Perhaps we can approach the others?
Absolutely !
Our general approach until now has been not to bug the sites which are
obviously "non profit" type, dedicated to education.
As for the obvious mirrors-for-money, yeah, we can approach them and
propose them a datafeed.
A template for such suggestion has been done a few months ago. It is
useable on OTRS. Do you have access to OTRS ? If not, OTRS members can
certainly provide you the template. It would be great someone (a
community volunteer) take the time to contact all "big" languages and
try to identify lists of major commercial mirrors. Maybe coordinate
contact of these mirrors and to suggest them datafeeds.
If there is a no, contact the developers to get these mirrors blocked.
The Foundation does have a template contract to propose afterwards, so
this will be easy to handle (a bit of Brad or Danny time though).
The datafeed must get activated, which requires more or less work.
Usually done by Brion (slows down other features development, nothing
perfect).
But yes, feasible.
Mostly need coordinators in the biggest languages. Web hunting to
identify major commercial mirrors. Then contacting them. Foundation can
take in charge administrative and technical follow up.
Ant
* Same for news agencies
Not sure I see how it would bring money. How so ?
I'll ask the user who posted this. David Gerard is probably right that
wikinews has to pick up a bit more before this will work.
* Make bio
info available for pda's. A lot easier to carry around than
field guides
Same question. Making it available only against a payment ?
If it requires a special format, we might consider that.
* Asks
subsidies from UN, EU and individual states.
Some expressed concerns with regards to independance. Limitations on
this very topic is mostly lack of human resources to make the requests.
Volunteers welcome.
I admit that these concerns are much more legitimate than when we have
a broad array of companies which advertise.
* Be more
selective in accepting articles
* Much of what we have is fancruft, and it seems fairly popular. Move
all fanstuff to a separate project, outside wikipedia. Call if
fanpedia or something. Let this project be more liberal in its
acceptance of media, and let this project accept advertisements. This
could probably support all wiki projects.
* If images cost to much bandwidth, put a limit of 3 images / article.
I cant estimate the interest of technical suggestions.
thanks for the feedback
Neither can I. But in the dutch pub I can ask the user who suggested
there was opensource software for grid compunting, if Brion thinks it
may be interesting.
Thank you for listening and commenting. I'll post a translation in the
appropriate thread in the pub of the Dutch wiki.
teun
>ant
>
>
>>teun
>>
>>On 12/29/06, Jeff V. Merkey <jmerkey(a)wolfmountaingroup.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Old Chinese proverb:
>>>
>>>"... no matter how loud the wind howls, the mountain cannot bow to it
..."
>>>
>>>mountain = foundation
>>>wind = people whining.
>>>
>>>:-)
>>>
>>>Jeff
>>>
>>>effe iets anders wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>Lots of people are yelling and shouting that the current vision and
policy
>>>>of the foundation is totally wrong. I would like to invite all these
people
>>>>and others to think about alternatives. We won't get rid of these
ugly
>>>>things (everybody agrees upon that, i guess) in the sitenotice without
any
>>>>serious alternatives. I already asked this in the Dutch Village Pump, I
hope
>>>>you will bring the question back to all your communities, to the places
>>>>where is discussed about the sitenotice. I have myself troubles to come
up
>>>>with serious alternatives, so I hope you guys have one. And when you have
>>>>one, then you can ideed start a discussion about which solution is better.
I
>>>>look forward to your ideas, and please keep the discussion about how bad
the
>>>>current solution is for other threads.
>>>>
>>>>Lodewijk / Eia
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>foundation-l mailing list
>>>>foundation-l(a)wikimedia.org
>>>>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>foundation-l mailing list
>>>foundation-l(a)wikimedia.org
>>>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>foundation-l mailing list
>foundation-l(a)wikimedia.org
>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>