Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Also, there must be an oversight process so that
if the community believes the LC has acted in error in a specific
case, it can be reopened and a constructive dialogue can be held.
Isn't that what we're doing? Didn't you just comment in a public
discussion suggesting that we have a public discussion? :)
--
Yours cordially,
Jesse Plamondon-Willard (Pathoschild)