That is entirely a matter for Mike and the new Board to deal with, first, at
the abstracted level of when legal counsel is going to have anything to say
about project-level issues and why; second, when a credible legal threat
exists, what action the Foundation is willing to take to make its existence
known to the community, and if it includes something like WP:OFFICE.
As an aside, Delirium, if your understanding of organizational structure is
so profoundly lacking as to not see what the significance of having a
legally existing Foundation is (and mind you, it already has existed for a
few years), I strongly suggest you divert some of your online energies to
learning about non-profit corporations before weighing in further. WMF is
long past anarchy. Sorry if that isn't welcome news to you.
On 7/14/07, Aphaia <aphaia(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
now we have a house lawyer again.
It means we will see WP:OFFICE activated even at least on English
Wikipedia?
On 4/27/07, P. Birken <pbirken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
In the discussion about the german translation of
WP:OFFICE, the
desire for transparent ways to see whether an action is actually an
office action or merely somebody impersonating the office was
expressed. I therefore ask the office to soon come up with a clear way
of how this is done. Again, I suggest using an office account.
Bye,
Philipp
--
KIZU Naoko
Wikiquote:
http://wikiquote.org
* habent enim emolumentum in labore suo *
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l