2014-06-18 1:43 GMT+05:30 Russavia <russavia.wikipedia(a)gmail.com>om>:
Yann,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Yann Forget <yannfo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The rules of the project, "free
license", or "in the public domain in
USA and in the source country", are fine as long as they are not used
to game the system.
Yann I totally agree with this.
The problem is, that the URAA RFC goes against that statement entirely by
ignoring or turning a blind eye to the copyright status of files in the US.
Can you explain why there is the blaring discrepancy in your viewpoint here?
Cheers
Russvia
My point here is not about URAA, but about exaggerate requirements
from some contributors.
And gaming the system is exactly what YOU did when you speedy deleted
the 4 files I mentioned in my first message.
I several times proposed to allow only a restricted sets of files
affected by URAA, not all (e.g. only files older than 50? years,
or/and orphan/anonymous files, and/or government files). It seems
there is a wild consensus about such a compromise, but you
deliberately ignore my proposal, and choose to attack unilaterally the
whole issue.
Yann