Daniel Mayer wrote:
--- Tim Starling
<t.starling(a)physics.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
The bylaws say that the Board can do whatever it
wants. However an
ad-hoc interpretation of the voting results after the vote has concluded
would hardly fill me with confidence. If you want a 6th board member,
have another vote, with well-defined rules.
If there is a consensus to do this, then there is no need for another vote.
Well, since I agree with Tim's viewpoint, it would seem there is not a
consensus, as a quick head-count indicates 3 people who've said they
think it's a good idea, and 2 who've said they don't.
If the board wants to appoint a sixth member unilaterally, it of course
has the power to change the bylaws to do so, but votes shouldn't be
interpreted based on criteria set *after* the voting took place.
-Mark