-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/05/2010 05:51, Andre Engels wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Kim Bruning
<kim(a)bruning.xs4all.nl> wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Andre
Engels wrote:
Being educational should be just another word for
being in scope, and
in scope are, in my opinion, in the first place those files that are
usable for the projects. That is the first thing that we should be
judging things by.
I've already emphasized that a bit already on the page, but more from
the WARNING angle.
That only says that pictures that are _used_ should not be deleted
indiscriminately. Used and usable are not the same.
Could you edit or comment on the page in a way
that reflects what you
just stated? :-)
Hardly. The page as it is now seems to go from the point of view that
we should not host any pornography, then restricts itself by trying to
get a narrow definition of 'pornography'. For me, whether or not
something is pornographic is at best a secondary issue.