On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Gnangarra <gnangarra(a)gmail.com> wrote:
We should be careful in not shaming communities to
vote poorly to save
face,
Well, that might be said of any sort of shaming, but we still do it:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2016/Eligibility_Crite…
(Interestingly, it seems that chapters which have been violating their
agreements with the WMF for years are still eligible to vote, though I
suppose they probably don't.)
The alternative to releasing this list is the status quo, in which
those who are well-connected enough to have someone share the list
with them can know who to canvass. Is this how we want to choose our
board?