On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Gnangarra gnangarra@gmail.com wrote:
We should be careful in not shaming communities to vote poorly to save face,
Well, that might be said of any sort of shaming, but we still do it: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2016/Eligibility_Criter... (Interestingly, it seems that chapters which have been violating their agreements with the WMF for years are still eligible to vote, though I suppose they probably don't.)
The alternative to releasing this list is the status quo, in which those who are well-connected enough to have someone share the list with them can know who to canvass. Is this how we want to choose our board?