Because the Arbitration Committee does have experience dealing with
harassment. Not many projects have such a body dedicated to dealing with
conflict. You are of course right that a general consultation should be
made, and I'm sure if there are other bodies you can point to the WMF would
love to consult with them too.
On 2 February 2015 at 18:04, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
If the WMF is consulting any specific entity of an
individual Wikimedia
project out of 800 for a crosswiki matter, that's ridiculous, period. I
don't see why bother looking into the specific merits of the entity in
question, or the allegations about them.
Nemo
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Landline (UK) 01780 757 250
Mobile (UK) 0798 1995 792