The argument being made is over the provision:
The freedom to distribute derivative works: In order
to give everyone the ability to improve upon a work,
the license must not limit the freedom to distribute a
modified version (or, for physical works, a work
somehow derived from the original), regardless of the
intent and purpose of such modifications. However,
some restrictions may be applied to protect these
essential freedoms or the attribution of authors (see
below).
In particular "distribute a modified version . . .
regardless of the intent and purpose of such
modifications" clashing with moral rights such as
"right to the respect of the work " and "right to
protection of honour and reputation"
Thanks
Birgitte SB
--- Delphine Ménard <notafishz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/20/07, Birgitte SB <birgitte_sb(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
Based on the definition [1] promoted by WMF, I
am
wondering if free content exists in France where
moral
rights are inalienable, perpetual and inviolable.
I'm sorry, but in the definition, I seem to miss the
part where free
content is tied to the "loss of' or 'giving up"
one's moral rights?
Could you point me to it?
Thank you.
Delphine
--
~notafish
NB. This address is used for mailing lists. Personal
emails sent to
this address will probably get lost.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com