On 7/17/07, Titoxd@Wikimedia <titoxd.wikimedia(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm. Now *why* exactly did they say that? I'm sure that they didn't say it
just because they felt like it, but rather, that there were reasons behind
that statement. If those reasons are made public (as much as it is
permitted
by common sense, of course), then we would know why adding a restriction
for
[ex-]employees has its benefits.
Well, the first thing would be to ask them to clarify whether they indeed
meant
current *and* former employees, or merely current employees.
I think the argument for not allowing concurrent employment and trusteeship
is
indeed strong, and definitely the case for striving to make that explicit is
well founded.
--
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]