On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
We've advertised third party for-profits in the
past with prominent
matched donations notices before (albeit controversially). This isn't
that different.
As you say, that one was controversial and this one isn't that
different. Then it should not surprise you that this one is
controversial too, should it? Or do people lose the right to complain
against something if it happens the second time?
--
André Engels, andreengels(a)gmail.com