On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The last post in that thread wasn't blocked
because of its content, it
was blocked because the thread itself was blocked. I could try to
reply to it now with a little paragraph about sunshine and rainbows
and it wouldn't go through. Nobody read that message and made the
decision not to post it to the ML, at least as far as I can tell.
It looks to me like Austin did exactly what he should've so I'm not
sure why you're implying he made an incorrect decision. Exactly what
did he do wrong in your opinion?
Mark
skype: node.ue
Actually, does it matter? List moderation and killfiling happens what, once
a year? I see no
problem with how it occurred this time, nor any reason to change the process
for the
future. Stevertigo is more interested in the debate, in my opinion, than any
particular
outcome. But foundation-l and wikien-l aren't debating clubs; folks cite the
tenor
of discussion, especially the ego-fueled point-by-point debate, as a common
reason
for unsubscribing.
If you find that people don't take your side even after you have "utterly
destroyed them,
point by point" then perhaps you should pick a new approach.
Nathan