On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Fred Bauder
<fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net>
wrote:
> On 18 November 2010 21:28, John Vandenberg
<jayvdb(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Keegan Peterzell
>> <keegan.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> It looks to me like they just get paid to get volunteers to work.
>>> Â Nice
>>> scheme. Â So it's not technically paid editing :)
>
>> That sounds similar to the role of a few WMF staff...
>
>
> Someone on another list discussing this suggested the WMF marketing
> monitoring the article about you as a service ...
Which list is this?
So we would charge people to monitor the article
about them? Would we
do
that for firms too? There would could be negligence liability if we
miss
something.
'monitoring' =/= 'action'
It would be easy to build an RSS feed for a set of articles and 'give'
that to any fool willing to pay for it.
--
John Vandenberg
If it is that easy, maybe it should be a feature available as a courtesy
to anyone or any organization that has an article about them.
Fred Bauder