This has been debated numerous times; to what extent
does the attribution
have to relate to the exact contribution of each author.
A list of authors has been considered acceptable in the past (including
on-wiki).
Tom
On 12 June 2012 23:48, Kim Bruning <kim(a)bruning.xs4all.nl> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 05:44:40AM +0000, Mike
Dupont wrote:
Hi,
Again the full history is available on
archive.org and i think that no
one
is going to think that this data is from me, it
is clearly marked as
being
from wikipedia.
You are very concientious, and normally this would indeed be adequate (not
perfect,
but definitely adequate :)
It is adequate because wikipedia itself retains full attribution
information in
page history. One can follow the chain from the copy back to the wikipedia
original
back to the page history and voila, more than you ever wanted to know.
The problem with deleted/hidden articles on en.wp is that the history
information
is also deleted/hidden; and therefore the attribution chain is broken.
Attribution information is important for legal and open content reasons of
course.
Is it possible to keep a copy of page history somewhere also?
I know the mediawiki export/import functions support this, and work
via GET request.
see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Export
eg:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Export/Train
sincerely,
Kim Bruning
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: