On 3/22/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Huh? He's
free to resign. He's not forced to give an explanation to
anyone who asks.
It sounds like he's blaming the board for his resignation but isn't
saying why. Doesn't seem fair on the board to me... while they
probably know the reasons, they can't defend themselves if he doesn't
make the reasons public.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
That's why rumouring is bad. "It sounds" ... no, that's just your
perception. He stated that he thinks some things can be done in a
better way. But he's not blaking the board on his resignation, and
probably the board knows already the reasons.
You say "The Board can't defend themselves..." , well fi the Board
needs the reasons, they can ask (and probably have) Danny in privte.
No need to vent such information in public.
You and I aren't entitled to demand an explanation and to know every
small detail. It's between Danny and the Foundation.