On 3 September 2011 11:03, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 3 September 2011 10:51, Ray Saintonge
<saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
The organization itself is not the objective.
+1
What things could WMF do to make itself obsolete as quickly as
possible, in as many individual areas as possible?
All sorts of things, but would that be desirable? While the
organisation obviously isn't the objective, that doesn't mean that the
objective is not to have the organisation. The organisation (or some
similar organisation) probably is the best way to achieve the
objective.