On 10 December 2010 08:45, Andreas Kolbe <jayen466(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Apart from summarising COM:PORN*, all that the draft
sexual content policy
was meant to do, actually, was to address two cases:
* Material that is illegal to host for the Foundation under Florida law
* Sexual images of people uploaded without their knowledge and consent
That would be why I voted "yes". The first category is already
nuke-on-sight, but the second we had some actual examples of.
- d.