On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Christine Moellenberndt < cmoellenberndt@wikimedia.org> wrote:
On 2/17/11 8:29 AM, whothis wrote:
If someone asks a question in a conference publicly, you can't take them aside and answer individually
and
expect that to satisfy the rest of the audience.
Actually, I'd like to beg to differ here. I have been to conferences where questions have been asked publicly to a panel. If the question seems too off topic for the general audience, or too specific for the general audience, the panel member being questioned will generally defer to answering the question after the main panel discussion is over. Then the two get together and talk it out "off-panel" if you will. At least in my discipline, I've not seen anyone get upset over it (I'm usually grateful that it happened :) And oftentimes the asker is pleased as well because it gives more time to get their question answered fully). If it was a question I was also interested in, I'll go and talk to the panelist/question asker myself as well. Or, if the audience disagrees, someone else will chime up "Actually I'd like to know that too," or "That's a valid question that maybe should be answered here." And it goes into that forum. But usually, it stays off-panel.
Or maybe my discipline is weird :) (wait, I knew that already.)
hah...I was referring to proper mailing list etiquette. The explanation above is rather lengthy to follow, let's just say I am not the only one complaining here.
Just a thought here, but maybe the "Community Department," should
actually
include some people from the community. I know it might be against some super-secret policy of avoiding community members but at least the "Community Department" could try including someone from the community.
You would be surprised to know how many people in the Foundation as a whole, including the Community department (and a BUNCH of the folks working on the fundraiser), come out of the community, including the Deputy Director and the Head of Reader Relations (who I report directly to) among others. And even if we don't come out of THIS community, some of us come out of other online communities. Which can give a fresh perspective and alleviate tunnel vision. Which, to my mind, is all to the good.
Yes, the Deputy Director and the Head of Reader Relations, surprised you stopped there, you could have added Steven walling to bring the total to 3 out of almost 60. That seems like the appropriate ratio. With all due respect, alternative point of views brought in by other online communities might be the problem here.
-Christine
Christine Moellenberndt Community Associate Wikimedia Foundation
christine@wikimedia.org
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l