Never tryed in en.wiki, but in PT.wiki we even have a 15 radom articles
selection to see the quality of pt.wiki articles in a small scale.
He did it 5 times from 2005 to 2008, and I never saw a sex article on it. In
fact we used to joke that pt.wiki is made only by French villages and
asteroids (because EVERYONE get one of them in their 15 articles) ;)
You people can see it all here:
http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usu%C3%A1rio:Indech/15_artigos_aleat%C3%B3rios
_____
*Béria Lima*
<http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre
acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a
fazer <http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Nossos_projetos>.*
On 18 October 2011 15:02, Lodewijk <lodewijk(a)effeietsanders.org> wrote:
I would guess that the odds of arriving at such
article are so low, that it
would not be worth the huge discussion it would definitely result into, to
make this change because there is barely any improvement. Have we ever
received complaints from people who arrived at such articles after pressing
the random article button?
Best,
lodewijk
No dia 18 de Outubro de 2011 16:00, Fae <fae(a)wikimedia.org.uk> escreveu:
Rather than filtering the unreferenced, I had in
mind articles such as
[[Human penis]] and [[Vagina]] where the lead may be NSFW (Tom's main
thrust) or unstable articles that are currently locked due to
edit-warring, blatant lobbying or similar.
Cheers,
Fae
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l