Never tryed in en.wiki, but in PT.wiki we even have a 15 radom articles selection to see the quality of pt.wiki articles in a small scale.
He did it 5 times from 2005 to 2008, and I never saw a sex article on it. In fact we used to joke that pt.wiki is made only by French villages and asteroids (because EVERYONE get one of them in their 15 articles) ;)
You people can see it all here: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usu%C3%A1rio:Indech/15_artigos_aleat%C3%B3rios _____ *Béria Lima* http://wikimedia.pt/(351) 925 171 484
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Nossos_projetos.*
On 18 October 2011 15:02, Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.org wrote:
I would guess that the odds of arriving at such article are so low, that it would not be worth the huge discussion it would definitely result into, to make this change because there is barely any improvement. Have we ever received complaints from people who arrived at such articles after pressing the random article button?
Best, lodewijk
No dia 18 de Outubro de 2011 16:00, Fae fae@wikimedia.org.uk escreveu:
Rather than filtering the unreferenced, I had in mind articles such as [[Human penis]] and [[Vagina]] where the lead may be NSFW (Tom's main thrust) or unstable articles that are currently locked due to edit-warring, blatant lobbying or similar.
Cheers, Fae
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l