On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
And that explicitly included offline reuse? If so, it looks like we're
ready to present a final proposal for the community to vote on. Even
with such a small sample size, those numbers are pretty conclusive.
1) Have the numbers been released? All I saw was a selective summary.
2) What do you think they're conclusive of?
The numbers given by Erik at the start of this thread are sufficient
to draw the conclusion that a significant majority of the community
will be happy with attribution by URL.
My one concern with the survey is that the options were not
particularly clearly defined - I'm not sure everyone taking it would
have understood what the online/offline split was all about.