On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 12:34 AM Christophe Henner <
christophe.henner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Steven,
If I may, I have a different reading on the topic. Knowledge Equity is a
topic because for centuries knowledges have been destroyed, banned, etc? as
such, and with our current rules with written sources, funding any
organisation empowering marginalised communities is critical.
If we were funding only direct integration of marginalised knowledges into
the project we would actually be missing so much.
I actually appreciate the Movement funding initiatives outside the
Movement.
As Nadee said in her email, and I get a feeling it also is partly your
point, what would be critical here would be to ensure the grantees are
supported and encouraged in working with local or thematic Wikimedia
Organisations.
@Nadee out of curiosity, is there any staff in the Knowledge Equity Fund
project in charge of working with grantees to increase their relationships
with us?
Thanks a lot :)
Christophe
Christophe,
Thanks for your thoughts. I think the problem with "I actually appreciate
the Movement funding initiatives outside the Movement." is where does the
boundary of acceptable initiatives end?
For instance, should we feel comfortable creating a grants program to fight
climate change? Extreme weather events obviously threaten the stability of
the projects, and might disrupt editors from volunteering their time.
Solving world hunger and global health issues would increase the pool of
potential volunteers. We could also fund a non-profit alternative to
Starlink, to increase global Internet access to make it possible for more
people to edit the projects.
The problem is that none of these things are what donors believe they are
funding when they give us $5 from a banner on Wikipedia asking them to
support the projects.
On Aug 16, 2023, at 8:36 AM, Steven Walling <steven.walling(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
?
This is really really disappointing to see. The lessons noted in the blog
post totally miss the point as to why the Wikimedia community has objected
to Knowledge Equity Fund. The issue is not community oversight via
committees or visibility into the work. It?s that the work had no
demonstrable impact on Wikimedia projects whatsoever. We all should want
the projects to be more equitable when it comes to representing
knowledge?it's perfectly aligned with the Wikimedia mission. This program
is doing absolutely nothing to accomplish that.
If we want to impact knowledge equity, why not say, let people working on
underserved languages and topics apply for expense reimbursement when
they've bought access to sources or equipment to create media for Commons?
Or fund a huge series of edit-a-thons on BIPOC topics?
If we want free knowledge created by and for people with less systemic
privilege in the world, direct grants (given to actual Wikimedians) is
something that the Foundation is uniquely placed to do, as opposed to
generic lump sum grants for addressing the root causes of social injustice
and inequity. While those are laudable problems to solve, they are not in
fact our organization?s mission and what donors think they are funding when
they give us money.
A second Knowledge Equity round that fails to specifically address how
each grantee and their work is going to help Wikimedia projects accomplish
our mission is a huge misstep and a violation of the trust that the
community and donors place in the Foundation to disburse funds. I fully
agree that we should find ways to correct for the fact that Wikimedia
content tends to reflect the unjust past and present of the world. We want
the sum of *all* knowledge, not just knowledge from/for people with money
and privilege, but this is not the way.
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 9:25 AM Nadee Gunasena <ngunasena(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
Hi all,
As part of the Wikimedia Foundation?s Annual Plan goal around supporting
knowledge equity
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2023-2024/Goals/Equity#Equity_Fund>
by supporting regional and thematic strategies, and helping close
knowledge gaps, I wanted to share an update on the Knowledge Equity Fund.
Earlier this year, the Foundation shared learnings from the first year
<https://diff.wikimedia.org/2023/04/12/what-weve-learned-from-the-equity-funds-first-round/>
of the Knowledge Equity Fund pilot, as well as reports from our first year
grantees. These learnings include how we can increase visibility into the
work of the grantees, and also connect the grantees with Wikimedians and
local communities to enable greater understanding and more ties to the work
of free knowledge on the Wikimedia projects.
With these learnings in mind, today we are announcing the second round
of grantees
<https://diff.wikimedia.org/2023/08/03/announcing-the-second-round-of-grantees-from-the-wikimedia-foundation-knowledge-equity-fund/>
from the Knowledge Equity Fund. This second round includes seven grantees
that span five regions, including the Fund?s first-ever grantees in Asia.
This diverse group of grantees was chosen from an initial pool of 42
nominations, which were received from across the Wikimedia movement through
an open survey in 2022 and 2023. Each grantee aligns with one of Fund?s five
focus areas
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund#Criteria_for_grantees>,
identified to address persistent structural barriers experienced by
communities of color that prevent equitable access and participation in
open knowledge. They are also recognized nonprofits with a proven track
record of impact in their region. The grantees include:
Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara, Indonesia: The Aliansi Masyarakat
Adat Nusantara <https://aman.or.id/>, or the Alliance of the Indigenous
Peoples of the Archipelago (AMAN for short), is a non-profit organization
based in Indonesia that works on human rights, journalism, and advocacy
issues for indigenous people.
Black Cultural Archives, United Kingdom: Black Cultural Archives
<https://blackculturalarchives.org/> is a Black-led archive and heritage
center that preserves and gives access to the histories of African and
Caribbean people in the UK.
Create Caribbean Research Institute, Commonwealth of Dominica: Create
Caribbean Research Institute <https://createcaribbean.org/create/>is the
first digital humanities center in the Caribbean.
Criola, Brazil: Criola <https://criola.org.br/> is a civil society
organization, based in Rio de Janeiro, dedicated to advocating for the
rights of Black women in Brazilian society.
Data for Black Lives, United States: Data for Black Lives
<https://d4bl.org/> is a movement of activists, organizers, and
scientists committed to the mission of using data to create concrete and
measurable change in the lives of Black people.
Filipino American National Historical Society, United States: The Filipino
American National Historical Society <http://fanhs-national.org/filam/>
has a mission to gather, document and share Filipino American history
through its 42 community based chapters.
Project Multatuli, Indonesia: Project Multatuli
<https://projectmultatuli.org/en/>is an organization dedicated to
non-profit journalism, especially for underreported topics, ranging from
indigenous people to marginalized issues.
The Equity Fund Committee, made up of five Wikimedia community members
and five Wikimedia Foundation staff, have also connected each of these
grantees with regional and relevant partners in the Wikimedia movement,
including local and established movement affiliates who can support
knowledge equity work and help grantees learn about how to connect back to
the work of free knowledge on the Wikimedia projects. We continue to look
for ways to increase these connections and welcome your input.
This second round of grants was administered by the Wikimedia Foundation,
after all remaining funds for the Equity Fund were transferred back from
Tides Advocacy to the Foundation earlier this year.
We welcome thoughts and questions about the Equity fund and the second
round of grantees on Meta
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund>.
Thank you,
Nadee Gunasena
On behalf of the Equity Fund Committee
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund#The_Knowledge_Equity_Fund_Committee>
Biyanto Rebin, Emna Mizouni, Gala Mayi Miranda, Kelly Foster, Maari
Zwick-Maitreyi, Aeryn Palmer, Jorge Vargas, Kassia Echavarri-Queen, Nadee
Gunasena, Sandister Tei
--
*Nadee Gunasena*
Chief of Staff
Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org