Some editors used to Monobook certainly find it more comfortable than
Vector, but many don't. I don't think there's any basis to conclude that
monobook is in some way better for editing in the general case, outside the
context of those long-term contributors.
(and, now, I am sure someone will pop up to say they loathe monobook and
classic is the only usable style...)
Andrew.
On 21 Nov 2013 21:26, "Matthew Flaschen" <matthew.flaschen(a)gatech.edu>
wrote:
On 11/21/2013 03:37 AM, WereSpielChequers wrote:
To some extent this can be considered a success
for Vector
and the shift of our default from a skin
optimised for editing to one
optimised for reading. Of course if we want to increase editing levels we
always have the option of defaulting new accounts to Monobook instead of
Vector.
I don't really agree that Vector is less encouraging of edits. I've been
using it for years, and don't feel it slows down my editing.
Matt Flaschen
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>