Hoi,
Even better then URL shorteners is the presentation of the URL in Unicode.
This will make the URL readable, memorable and guessable. It may be that
this has everything to do with the browser that is used.. It is certainly a
good reason to select one browser over an other.
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%…
properly in my browser, it gets spoiled when I past it in my mail..
Thanks,
GerardM
On 11 February 2011 14:36, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11 February 2011 11:30, Mingli Yuan
<mingli.yuan(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So I just want to know the possibility that
foundation can support it or
not?
And how should I improve the work to make foundation accept this service?
A URL shortener is a very good idea.
Even for English, there's
http://enwp.org for instance. English
Wikinews has
http://enwn.net . Neither of these is official.
But maybe having an official shortener would be a good idea.
- d.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l