On 11/30/05, Elisabeth Bauer <elian(a)djini.de> wrote:
"If you contribute to the Wikimedia projects, you
are publishing every
word you post publicly."
german translation:
"Wenn Sie zu den Wikimedia-Projekten beitragen, veröffentlichen Sie
jedes Wort, das sie abschicken, öffentlich."
That's the second sentence of our privacy policy, to be found on
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Privacy_policy
and inspires me to loose a few words on how policy writing should be
handled in a multilingual project:
* Decide on the core principles of the policy - the essential rules
* Create a nice, elaborate page in english which you place on the
Foundation wiki as the official policy
* Ask the community to create inofficial translations based on the
essential rules - they may want to phrase a few things differently, some
things may need longer or shorter explanations depending on culture,
country or project. They may translate the english version word by word
but are free to formulate the essential rules in their own words if they
prefer.
* Each translation should have a note on top that in doubt the english
version is the valid one.
In the case of the privacy policy, I decided to act on these principles.
The german privacy policy at
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Datenschutz tries to say the same
as the english one but in own words. Some paragraphs and sentences which
are not part of the core rules were shortened for the sake of clarity
and readability.
If you disagree with this you may want to find community members who
will create a literal translation. My feel for language and style
doesn't allow me to do so.
I like the idea, because I believe we need to pay more attention to
those "cultural differences". And I am not for literal translations
either, because
However, where possible, I really think we should make the
translations of policies as "official" as possible, especially for
things as important as the privacy policy.
I would hate us to fall in the GFDL pit of having one unintelligible
policy in English and arguing that it was the only valid one. For some
languages (unfortunately not for all), we probably have enough people
with the skills to make sure the policy has the same core meaning as
the English one, that it takes into consideration the specificities of
one language and/or culture. If it can be approved by the relevant
people and made official, all the better. Creative Commons did it...
if anyone else, I think *we* can do it too. ;-)
But still, I think your idea is a good one, and should be adopted widely.
Best,
Delphine
--
~notafish