*q.e.d.* no arguments, nothing more to add, just ''ad hominem'', and
provocations.
On 21 October 2015 at 13:08, Ilario Valdelli <valdelli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I will be simple like explaining it to a baby.
On 21.10.2015 16:29, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton wrote:
How about less provocations, attempts to
breakdown the conversation with
violence, and support our idea in a civilized manner ? So " it's not good
to give publicly comments on the candidates.", why do you think that?
I think nothing. I administer a list where the entities involved in the
process decided that.
Decision taken by these entities, I execute their decision.
I am, politely, addressing you to the right place to discuss it.
I am not understanding your affirmation, because
you did not offer any
argument that corroborates to your statement.
Yes, I know, you do not understand.
Anyway we can continue "ad libitum" for the sample reason that you don't
like it but it's not up to me to support your dislike.
Regards
--
Ilario Valdelli
Wikimedia CH
Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens
Association pour l’avancement des connaissances libre
Associazione per il sostegno alla conoscenza libera
Switzerland - 8008 Zürich
Tel: +41764821371
http://www.wikimedia.ch
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton
rodrigo.argenton(a)gmail.com
+55 11 979 718 884