*q.e.d.* no arguments, nothing more to add, just ''ad hominem'', and provocations.
On 21 October 2015 at 13:08, Ilario Valdelli valdelli@gmail.com wrote:
I will be simple like explaining it to a baby.
On 21.10.2015 16:29, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton wrote:
How about less provocations, attempts to breakdown the conversation with violence, and support our idea in a civilized manner ? So " it's not good to give publicly comments on the candidates.", why do you think that?
I think nothing. I administer a list where the entities involved in the process decided that.
Decision taken by these entities, I execute their decision.
I am, politely, addressing you to the right place to discuss it.
I am not understanding your affirmation, because you did not offer any argument that corroborates to your statement.
Yes, I know, you do not understand.
Anyway we can continue "ad libitum" for the sample reason that you don't like it but it's not up to me to support your dislike.
Regards
-- Ilario Valdelli Wikimedia CH Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens Association pour l’avancement des connaissances libre Associazione per il sostegno alla conoscenza libera Switzerland - 8008 Zürich Tel: +41764821371 http://www.wikimedia.ch
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe