--------------------------------------------------
From: "Anthony" <wikimail(a)inbox.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 5:24 PM
I don't think I can chalk this up as
"old stuff" as long as people
involved in the foundation keep lying to and/or misleading the public
about it. Sue's comments in particular I found very disturbing.
If you want some "new stuff", though, can someone please explain the
"employee receivable" and "allowance for doubtful employee"
accounts?
You don't have to name names when doing so.
Anthony,
While I have never questioned anyone's right to reasonable discussion, your
implication that Sue is lying is way, way, WAY out of line. Put up or shut
up. Call her a liar, or don't, but either way your emails are headed
straight for my trash-can.
In civilized discourse, one does not get to wantonly call someone a liar. I
think you have, once again, crossed a line.
Everything I've seen of Sue suggests that she's an above-board, ethical
woman. You can disagree without calling someone a liar. You can question -
even firmly - without resorting to name-calling. You have failed to do so
and I find it particularly offensive. I respect those who question and
those who resist. There's a place in this community for an agitator.
Common courtesy is required, however.
Philippe
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
I have to concur here, and suggest moderation here as well, if the
continues.
./scream