On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Ziko van Dijk <vandijk(a)wmnederland.nl>wrote;wrote:
2012/2/14 Jan-Bart de Vreede
<jdevreede(a)wikimedia.org>rg>:
It is clear to me that there is a close link
between the
fundraising/dissemination discussion and the increased options of
"organising" ourselves. I am also convinced that we
Indeed, and it may not be a coincidence that these two letters came
out more or less at the same time. :-) I find it good that the WMF
board is taking up these discussions and opens them again.
How about asking the *official* opinion of the chapters, within a
certain time frame (e.g. 1 or 2 months)?
Meaning? I continue to think it would be great if we had a wide range of
opinion on this - both from chapters and from others in the movement.
Because the MR process has gone on for so long, I'm personally sceptical of
extending the deadline. (I'm not convinced we will actually get more
discussion with more time - that has not necessarily been the history of MR
since 2010 July, when it began.
So at this moment, I'm leaning towards a one-month focused period of
discussion.
Best
Bishakha
Then we would have a more
substantial and reliable feedback, compared to the mails on a
mailinglist or talk page comments, all done by people as individuals.
Kind regards
Ziko
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland
dr. Ziko van Dijk, voorzitter
http://wmnederland.nl/
-----------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l