On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Ziko van Dijk vandijk@wmnederland.nlwrote:
2012/2/14 Jan-Bart de Vreede jdevreede@wikimedia.org:
It is clear to me that there is a close link between the
fundraising/dissemination discussion and the increased options of "organising" ourselves. I am also convinced that we
Indeed, and it may not be a coincidence that these two letters came out more or less at the same time. :-) I find it good that the WMF board is taking up these discussions and opens them again.
How about asking the *official* opinion of the chapters, within a certain time frame (e.g. 1 or 2 months)?
Meaning? I continue to think it would be great if we had a wide range of opinion on this - both from chapters and from others in the movement.
Because the MR process has gone on for so long, I'm personally sceptical of extending the deadline. (I'm not convinced we will actually get more discussion with more time - that has not necessarily been the history of MR since 2010 July, when it began.
So at this moment, I'm leaning towards a one-month focused period of discussion.
Best Bishakha
Then we would have a more substantial and reliable feedback, compared to the mails on a mailinglist or talk page comments, all done by people as individuals.
Kind regards Ziko
--
Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland dr. Ziko van Dijk, voorzitter http://wmnederland.nl/
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l