reference metadata in a single place, away from the
wikitext. Defining
refs with a "refname" in the text doesn't seem too bad... other than
the mess of trying to get a different stylistic system going, is there
some reason we don't do this?
-- phoebe
I cannot see anything positive in that refname system. It is
complicated to the user and invites people to indicate less thoroughly
were the information comes from (dropping page numbers, because it's
the same book). There is absolutely no problem to copy the full
reference information into the ref, making it independent from other
refs and from "Literature".
Ziko
--
Ziko van Dijk
NL-Silvolde