2011/4/5 David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
On 5 April 2011 03:02, MZMcBride <z(a)mzmcbride.com> wrote:
A lot of the projects that Wikimedia is investing
in today are small and
focused on particular needs of the Wikimedia Foundation, not the Wikimedia
community. One example might be an article feedback tool that's largely
focused on ensuring that Wikimedia fulfills its Public Policy grant
requirements rather than actually being a useful tool for rating and
evaluating articles. (Imagine if you could find the most fascinating
articles, similar to ted.com's system; now look at what Wikimedia has
implemented.)
*cough* From 2005:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:David_Gerard/1.0
Magnus put together a quick version, but Brion didn't like the code
and it never happened. However, mine is just one such proposal.
Article rating has been a wanted feature for *years*.
... And in the Hungarian Wikipedia it was even implemented quite a
long time ago. If i recall correctly, at some point i saw it in the
Polish, too.
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
"We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace." - T. Moore