Brian: before you continue talking, and noting that I still don't see
you in #veropedia
Veropedia gets it's articles by parsing a Wikipedia article,
generating a list of improvements (404s, disambigs, malformed
templates, bad templates, readability indices etc.) and then the
veropedian IMPROVES THE WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE until it passes the
veropedia test, at which point it is uploaded.
There is no folding stuff back into WP. Waking up on the wrong side
of the bed is no excuse for making a contentious statement on a topic
you apparently know nothing about. Sorry, I tried to be nice about it
in the last email, but your response is plain childish.
-Dan
On Nov 20, 2007, at 6:33 PM, Brian McNeil wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
On 20/11/2007, Waerth
<waerth(a)asianet.co.th> wrote:
> Because we vannot do it all! Sometimes you
need to branch off
> specialistic projects to small groups of people. The Wikimedia
> projects
> have grown so big that the head and the body usually walk in
> different
> directions and do different things. It is very difficult to steer so
> many people. Like an earlier poster mentioned .... consensus amongst
> such a huge body is impossible. That is easier reached amongst a
> smaller
> group of people. I hope more initiatives like veropedia will arise!
Open content: "Use our stuff. Please! (And
give back your version
too.)"
As the most succinct response on this I'll respond on this one.
I get the message, the foundation can't do everything and the
license allows
- nay - encourages projects like this. Good luck working out the
mechanics
of the process of folding stuff back in to WP.
Oh, and judging from some of the other posts today I'm not the only
one that
didn't actually fall out of the wrong side of bed but was forcibly
evicted
before adequate sleep time had been acquired.
Brian McNeil
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l