On 7/18/07, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonavaro@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/18/07, Aphaia aphaia@gmail.com wrote:
<snippage>
As long as minimum subjective line of our community member's involvement sense matter, I think we don't need a new poll.
. . .
<snip> . . . > As part of Election committee, I personally think the requirements of > this year was reasonable, but review is always welcome, specially > based on census, poll or whatever.
Hmm. I am confused. Are you against a poll or for it?
I am afraid you simplified my responses too much.
For the first quote, I pointed out we don't need to poll to learn what type of complaint exists. I don't even oppose "I feel myself qualified but Eleccom said differently. Yeeek" type pole. But from talk page interactions, I think we know already what kind of claims we have. For that purpose, we have not to have a poll. The claimed minimum line is "all editors including anons", and I don't think there is a much lower requirement.
For the second quote, rational review of rules and policies are always helpful in my opinion, specially when we know some grumbling about that. Such polls would however be different from the suggested at first, and I strongly suggest it should be intersubjective, what type of requirement the community or at least the majority of the community think adequate, ideally regardless how it affects themselves.