There are still over 2,700 known notable women scientists without stubs:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Missing_ar…
And those are just the women scientists who made it on to Wikidata but
not Wiktionary somehow. The old ISI/Thompson Reuters Web of Science
list was a lot longer. I don't think 100,000 stubs is an unreasonable
number.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Keegan Peterzell
<keegan.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
"The nerve of these women, to think that they can
write encyclopedia
articles on women who must inherently be non-notable! There's nothing to
write about here."
That's basically what your email says. No complaints when the subject is
anything else from you, when these thematic editing are held on other
subjects.
This looks like a wondeful initiative, not a disaster.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>