There are still over 2,700 known notable women scientists without stubs:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Missing_art...
And those are just the women scientists who made it on to Wikidata but not Wiktionary somehow. The old ISI/Thompson Reuters Web of Science list was a lot longer. I don't think 100,000 stubs is an unreasonable number.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Keegan Peterzell keegan.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
"The nerve of these women, to think that they can write encyclopedia articles on women who must inherently be non-notable! There's nothing to write about here."
That's basically what your email says. No complaints when the subject is anything else from you, when these thematic editing are held on other subjects.
This looks like a wondeful initiative, not a disaster. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe