He he... Quality is popular until someone points out errors on your own articles! It is a quite difficult and controversial topic.
John
Den søn. 16. apr. 2017, 10.37 skrev Hajdu Kálmán hmarcell@startadsl.hu:
Hi John,
In Hungary, on the Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences of the Szent István University (http://gtk.sziu.hu/en) Pitlik László docents (Pitlik.Laszlo@gtk.szie.hu) works on “robot-lectors”. The idea is very similar with automated quality assurance. ( http://miau.gau.hu/miau2009/index.php3?x=e0&string=lektor http://miau.gau.hu/miau2009/index.php3?x=e0&string=lector).
You probably could contact him. But I should warn you he, as user Myx, he is banned in german Wikipedia, and his articles deleted in Hungarian Wikipedia.
Kalman
-- Eredeti üzenet -- *Feladó:* John Erling Blad jeblad@gmail.com jeblad@gmail.com *Címzett: *Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org *Elküldve:* 2017. április 15. 23:50 *Tárgy : *[Wikimedia-l] Quality assurance of articles
Are anyone doing any work on automated quality assurance of articles? Not the ORES-stuff, that is about creating hints from measured features. I'm thinking about verifying existence and completeness of citations, and structure of logical arguments.
John _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe