On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/04/2008, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
My opinion is that the discussion list of PVC should be this list, foundation-l.
The whole point of a council is to have a small group that can discuss things more constructively that a large one, such as the members of this list. If the discussion is happening on this list, then it will just be a discussion among members of this list. The council list could be readable by the public, but posting to it needs to be restricted to council members otherwise there isn't actually a council.
Maybe I didn't express my thought well. I think that the process of making some PVC's conclusion should be:
1. PVC prepares a document for talk (at the closed list or at the read-only list by the public), maybe even with possible conclusions. 2. Public discussion on foundation-l with time limit (let's say, 7 days per topic; however, I don't think that it would be necessary to talk on foundation-l only about one topic at the same time). 3. PVC gathers opinions and makes final proposal per topic (again, at the closed list or at the read-only list by the public).
BTW, I like the idea of read-only list by the public for internal PVC's list.